Vietnam War

Introduction Vietnam War was a long time tussle between the northern and the southern region of Vietnam which culminated into one of the bloodiest wars of the time. America played a dominant role in this particular war with Hanoi and Washington waging war in an attempt to ensure that Vietnam was free from the domination of foreigners. This paper seeks to compare the ability of Hanoi and Washington in waging the war successfully.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Vietnam War specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Background Information The Vietnam War was a conflict that was military in nature, occurred between the years 1954 and 1975, and was between the communists and the non-communists. The communists received immense support from China while the non-communists were supported by America. The first war that preceded the Vietnam War was known as Indochina War where the Southern part of Vietnam was fighting to prevent fro m being united with the northern part under the policies of communism. When this war ended, these two factions were kept apart to prevent further damage and they were expected to remain that way until the next elections were held. The Paris Agreement In the year 1973, an agreement known as the Paris agreement was signed and this was meant to end the more than a decade war between the South Vietnamese and the North Vietnamese. Under this agreement, there are various issues that were agreed upon with Hanoi and Washington each stating their position regarding the issue. There was an acrimonious agreement between Hanoi and Washington in the signing of the agreement although parties understood this agreement could have far-reaching consequences to both the North and the South Vietnam. Though Hanoi and Washington were aware that this agreement could bring problems to the already warring factions, the events that had taken place earlier both parties to the agreement that such a move was th e only way out considering the surrounding circumstances. The provisions of the agreement were quite vague and thus not workable with both Washington and Hanoi ignoring the necessary factors of the agreement. To both parties, the most important aspect of the agreement at the time was to fulfil certain purposes for each side.Advertising Looking for essay on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Washington on one hand was concerned in having the American prisoners released as well as being able to formally withdraw from participating ion the Vietnam and marinating the credibility that America had during the Cold War. Hanoi on the other hand was more concerned on being able to force the forces from America to withdraw from the Vietnam War, ensuring that the revolution that was socialist in nature that was going to happen in North Vietnam was saved and being able to improve on prospects of reuniting the two warr ing factions. Steps by Hanoi and Washington In Washington, there was an elevation of diplomacy which was meant to ensure that the support that America was giving to South Vietnam was not in vain. Nixon, the then president of America placed great emphasis on steeping up diplomacy that there was manipulation of wars in Vietnam both in the air and the ground with the main aim being to ensure that the negotiation of the Paris were fulfilled. Hanoi was in an equally swift move to ensure that all measures had been put in control. Diplomacy was also elevated but in this case, different strategies were adopted. In the year 1972, having made keen observations of all that was taking place and with the flop of Spring Offensive came as a clear indication to Hanoi that it would not be practically possible to gain a victory through the military and that diplomacy was the only tool that they could use for an assured victory (Kissinger, 2003, p.543). This was the same case with Washington who had r ealised that diplomacy was the only way that the bloody war which had lasted for so long could be ended with the terms and conditions being most favourable The Paris Agreement had been signed by Washington and Hanoi with both parties being under extreme pressure due to all the surrounding circumstances one of them being military intervention. The Vietnam War had gone on for a very long time and thus had proven to be very costly for all the parties involved.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Vietnam War specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Neither of the parties seemed willing to back down on seeing their part of the bargain in the Paris Agreement being fulfilled. Hanoi was not accepting anything short of a solution that would serve to bring unity to the whole country of Vietnam (Kissinger, 2003, p. 456). Due to the high cost that both parties encountered during the war, it became apparent that it would not be possible to fulfil some of the provisions of the agreement as each party was now concerned to ensue that their ambitions were met. Thus, the parties were only keen to honour the part of the agreement which favoured them while generally disregarding the letter and spirit of the agreement. Interaction between Washington and Hanoi These two sides had not always interacted or at least the interaction was not as frequent. It was only after the outcome of the Tet Offensive that the two sides began to hold talks both private and public. For a period of close to years, the talks did not yield much other than the adoption of a decision to bring the bombing of Vietnam to an end. In the year 1970, Hanoi and Washington resumed talks and this time, they were more consistent and better outcome was realized. This is how the Paris Agreement of 1972 came to be. Importance of Diplomacy in Vietnam War As mentioned, there were a lot of negotiations and talks that were held between Hanoi and Washington regardin g the Vietnam War. Looking keenly at all the vents that led to the Paris Agreement and later brought to and end decades of fighting between tow regions of one country, it is apparent that diplomacy was central in all these issued. It is also argued by many scholars that the outcome of the Vietnam War was not as a result of the battles that were fought but more so, the diplomatic talks that were held between Washington and Hanoi (Levie, 2004, p.98). It was through the Paris Agreement that certain conditions were set and both parties were ready to out necessary measures in place to ensure that the war was brought to an end. Conclusion The Vietnam War was one of the bloodiest wars that were ever witnessed. This war saw a diplomatic clash of France and America both of whom had vested interests in Vietnam. However continued talks between America and France helped bring the Vietnam War to an end.Advertising Looking for essay on international relations? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More References Kissinger, H. (2003). Ending the Vietnam War: a history of America’s involvement in and extrication from the Vietnam War. London: Simon and Schuster. Levie, D. (2004). The Vietnam War. London: Twenty-First Century Books This essay on Vietnam War was written and submitted by user Mess1ah to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Medical Stent Essays

Medical Stent Essays Medical Stent Paper Medical Stent Paper Medical Stent is a tiny tube medical device placed into an artery, blood vessel, or other duct to hold the structure open when conducting a medical procedure called stenting. Over the years, there have been different kinds of stents which came out in the market. The traditional stent is made up of metal or plastic mesh-like material. This stent is commonly used in patients who have a narrowing in their coronary arteries caused by atherosclerosis. Exponent Self-Expanding Carotid Stent with Over-the-Wire (OTW) Delivery System and the Exponent Self-Expanding Carotid Stent with Rapid-Exchange (RX) Delivery System – mainly used to re-open narrowing regions of the carotid arteries (supplies blood to the brain) in the neck. The FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft – a flexible and self-expanding tube made of ePTFE and a metallic support structure known as stent, which is commonly used as treatment for stenosis (blockage) at the venous anastomoses of an A-V access graft. NexStent – a metal mesh cut from a nitinol folded sheet that has two systems: the stent and either of the two delivery systems (over the wire or monorail), which commonly used during angioplasty. Cordis PRECISE OTW Nitinol Stent System – a device consist of a stent, a metal mesh tube on a delivery catheter and a delivery catheter system. This is commonly used in conjunction with an embolic protection system which is a micromesh filter basket device on the end of a delivery catheter. Zilver Vascular Stent – a thin, flexible metal mesh tube that can be implanted in the large arteries which supply blood to the pelvis and legs called iliac arteries. This is commonly used to treat patients with narrowing of an iliac artery. GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis – a flexible, metallic tubular shaped device which is mounted on the end of a delivery catheter and held in place by a release mechanism. Rithron-XR Coronary Stent System – consist of an expandable, slotted, stainless steel tube stent and a stent delivery catheter, which is commonly used to treat patients who have narrowing in their coronary arteries caused by atherosclerosis.

Issues of Our Times International Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 2

Issues of Our Times International - Essay Example In this paper I will be examining the MDGs in terms of success or progress, success stories and failures with the aim drawing the lessons learnt. In the MDGs the world identified eight major challenges facing nations of the world especially in the developing world and embarked on an ambitious plan to reduce if not eliminate them. Eradicating extreme poverty and hunger across the world, achieving universal primary education and promoting gender equality and empowering women for the f8irst three MDGs. Significant progress has been seen in this area as by 2012 the world targets had been achieved. Reducing the rates of child mortality and improving maternal health care are two goals that still require a lot of effort especially in the poorest nations. The last three goals i.e. ensuring environmental sustainability, fighting diseases such as HIV/AIDS, malaria and others, and developing global partnerships for development are the other goals on which some remarkable progress has been made but more is required in order to meaningfully influence lives. On a larger perspective and basing on available statistics, there has been some significant progress overall but with the 2015 deadline just around the corner the world may miss on the targets in some of the goals. In the first goal of eradicating extreme poverty and hunger, the goal was set at halving the proportion persons living on $1.25 and below around the world. The target was achieved in 2008 mostly as a result of rapid economic expansion in the emerging economies of Asia. Persons in extreme poverty as well as poverty rates have gone down in all regions and the working poor have reduced significantly. Attaining universal primary education as a target has also seen significant effort, enrollment stood at 90% in 2010 as compared to 82% in 1999. Though encouraging the rate is slow and the goal may not be attained by 2015.over a half of those children out of school are sub-Saharan Africa,